4 Pillars of AI Contracts Validity: A 2025 Legal Guide

---

Table of Contents

• Introduction: The Rise of AI in Indian Commerce
• The Legal Foundation: Can an AI Form a Valid Contract?
• The Legal Framework Governing AI Contracts in 2025
• Practical Steps to Ensure Enforceability of AI Contracts
• Navigating Liability and Risks in AI Contracting
• About The Kanoon Advisors
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Conclusion: Preparing Your Business for the Future of Contracts

---

Introduction: The Rise of AI in Indian Commerce

The integration of artificial intelligence into business operations is no longer a futuristic concept; it’s a present-day reality transforming industries across Delhi NCR and India. From automating supply chains to personalizing customer experiences, AI is a powerful engine of efficiency. However, as businesses increasingly delegate tasks to autonomous systems, a critical legal question emerges: Are contracts generated, negotiated, or executed by AI legally valid and enforceable in India? This question strikes at the heart of commercial law, challenging long-standing principles with new technological paradigms. Navigating this intersection requires a deep understanding of India’s evolving legal landscape, an area where our comprehensive legal services provide crucial clarity for businesses. This article, drawing upon The Kanoon Advisors’ 40+ years of combined legal expertise, provides a definitive guide to the legal status of AI contracts in India for 2025 and beyond.

---

The Legal Foundation: Can an AI Form a Valid Contract?

Before we can assess the validity of an AI-generated contract, we must first return to the foundational principles of Indian contract law. The bedrock of all commercial agreements in the country is the Indian Contract Act of 1872. For any agreement to be a legally binding contract, it must satisfy several essential conditions. The introduction of an autonomous AI system complicates, but does not necessarily negate, these requirements.

What is an AI-Generated Contract?

An AI-generated contract is an agreement where one or more essential stages of contract formation are performed by an artificial intelligence system without real-time human intervention. This can range from an AI drafting a contract based on a set of parameters, to an AI-powered agent autonomously negotiating prices and terms, sending a formal offer, and even accepting a counter-offer. The key element is the automation of cognitive tasks that were traditionally performed by humans.

How Does AI Align with the Indian Contract Act, 1872?

The validity of AI contracts hinges on whether they can satisfy the core elements defined in Section 10 of the Act. Let’s dissect each component from the perspective of artificial intelligence law.

1. Offer and Acceptance

A valid contract begins with a lawful offer and an unconditional acceptance. An AI system, acting on pre-programmed instructions and data, can certainly generate and communicate an offer. For example, an e-commerce platform’s AI can offer a product at a specific price. Similarly, it can be programmed to accept an offer that meets certain criteria. Legally, the offer and acceptance are not deemed to be made by the AI itself, but by the legal entity (the person or company) that deployed the AI. The AI is considered a sophisticated tool or an agent acting on behalf of its principal.

2. Lawful Consideration

Consideration is the ‘price’ paid for the promise, and it must be lawful. In AI-driven transactions, this is typically straightforward. The AI facilitates the exchange of goods, services, or money between the contracting parties. The legality of the consideration is determined by the nature of the transaction itself, not the technology used to execute it.

3. Competency to Contract

This is the most significant legal hurdle. Under Indian law, only legal persons (natural persons like individuals, or juristic persons like companies) are competent to enter into a contract. An AI, no matter how advanced, does not possess legal personality. It cannot sue or be sued. Therefore, an AI cannot be a party to a contract. The contract is always between the human or corporate users of the AI system. The legal capacity of these users is what determines competency.

4. Free Consent

Consent must be free from coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. In the context of AI, this means the human parties must have willingly entered the agreement facilitated by the AI. An interesting question arises if the AI makes a mistake (e.g., a pricing error). In such cases, the law would likely treat it as a mistake of fact, potentially making the contract voidable, and liability would fall upon the entity that deployed the AI.

---

The Legal Framework Governing AI Contracts in 2025

While the Indian Contract Act, 1872, provides the foundation, it’s the Information Technology Act, 2000, that builds the bridge to the digital age and gives legal sanctity to electronic and AI-facilitated agreements.

Why is the Information Technology Act, 2000 the Key?

The IT Act is the cornerstone of digital commerce in India. Section 10A of the Act explicitly states that a contract shall not be deemed unenforceable solely on the ground that electronic means were used for its formation. This provision is technology-neutral and is the primary source of legal validity for AI-generated contracts. It confirms that as long as the essential elements of a valid contract are present, the use of an automated electronic agent does not invalidate the agreement. For official reference, businesses can consult the text of the Information Technology Act, 2000 on the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology website.

How Do You Prove an AI Contract in Court? The Role of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872

A valid contract is only useful if it can be proven in court. For electronic agreements, this is governed by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, particularly Section 65B. This section lays down the conditions for the admissibility of electronic records as evidence. According to court statistics, failure to comply with the procedural requirements of Section 65B is a leading reason for the rejection of electronic evidence in over 40% of such commercial disputes. This includes providing a certificate that identifies the electronic record, describes the manner of its creation, and confirms the proper functioning of the device that produced it. For AI contracts, this means businesses must maintain meticulous, tamper-proof logs of the AI’s operations.

What Have Indian Courts Said About Electronic Contracts?

Indian courts, including the Supreme Court, have progressively affirmed the validity of electronic contracts. In landmark judgments, such as the case of Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal & Ors., the Supreme Court has clarified and stressed the mandatory nature of the Section 65B certificate for the admissibility of electronic evidence. This judicial precedent reinforces the need for robust technical and procedural safeguards when using AI for contracting. As an authoritative source, the Supreme Court of India provides access to its judgments, which shape the interpretation of these laws.

Feature	Traditional Contracts	AI-Generated Contracts
Formation	Human negotiation and manual signing	Automated process by algorithms
Record	Physical paper or scanned PDF documents	Immutable digital logs, blockchain entries, system data
Expression of Intent	Inferred from direct human communication	Attributed to the human principal via programming and authorization
Evidence in Court	Physical signatures, witness testimony, original documents	Electronic records supported by a mandatory Section 65B certificate

---

Practical Steps to Ensure Enforceability of AI Contracts

Understanding the law is the first step; implementing it is what protects your business. To ensure your AI-generated contracts are legally robust and can withstand scrutiny in the courts of Delhi NCR, we at The Kanoon Advisors recommend a proactive, structured approach.

How to Architect Legally Sound AI-Driven Agreements

The key is to design your systems and processes with legal requirements in mind from the outset, not as an afterthought. This involves a blend of technical safeguards and clear legal drafting.

Step-by-Step Legal Process for Implementation

1. Step 1: Attribute Legal Personality in the Agreement. Your contract’s terms and conditions must explicitly state the names of the legal persons (individuals or companies) who are parties to the agreement. It should be clear that the AI is merely a communication or transaction tool, not a contracting party.
2. Step 2: Define the AI’s Scope and Authority. Internally and, where appropriate, externally, document the precise boundaries within which the AI is authorized to act. This includes price limits, acceptable terms, and scenarios that require human intervention. This documentation is vital in case of a dispute.
3. Step 3: Implement “Human-in-the-Loop” (HITL) Oversight. For high-value or complex contracts, build in mandatory checkpoints where a human must review and approve the AI’s proposed course of action. This mitigates the risk of costly automated errors.
4. Step 4: Maintain Immutable, Timestamped Audit Trails. Your system must log every step of the contract formation process: the offer sent, the data considered, the acceptance received, and the exact time of each action. Technologies like blockchain can provide a high degree of immutability. These logs are your primary evidence.
5. Step 5: Draft Clear and Specific Dispute Resolution Clauses. Your agreement should specify the governing law (e.g., the laws of India) and jurisdiction (e.g., “subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in New Delhi”). Consider including an arbitration clause for faster resolution of disputes arising from the AI’s actions.
6. Step 6: Ensure Compliance with Evidence Act Requirements. Have a process in place to generate the Section 65B certificate whenever required for litigation. The person in charge of the computer systems (e.g., your IT head) should be prepared to sign this certificate, attesting to the integrity of the electronic records. This is especially crucial for financial transactions, which can have implications similar to those seen by a cheque bounce lawyer when payment obligations are disputed.

---

Navigating Liability and Risks in AI Contracting

When a contract is breached or an error occurs, the question of liability becomes paramount. With AI in the mix, pinpointing responsibility can be complex. Businesses in Delhi NCR must understand these potential liabilities to effectively manage risk.

Who is Legally Responsible When an AI Makes a Mistake?

Since the AI is not a legal person, it cannot be held liable. The responsibility will fall on one or more of the human or corporate entities involved. Indian courts would likely consider the following frameworks:

• The Principal-Agent Framework: The most common approach is to treat the AI as an agent and its user as the principal. Under this doctrine, the principal is liable for the acts of their agent performed within the scope of their authority. So, if your company’s AI enters into a faulty contract, your company is liable.
• Product Liability: If the error occurred due to a fundamental flaw, bug, or defect in the AI software itself, a case could be made against the developer or provider of the AI system under product liability principles.
• Negligence: A party could be found negligent if they failed to exercise reasonable care in the deployment, maintenance, or supervision of the AI system, leading to a foreseeable harm or loss for the other contracting party.

What are the Top 3 Business Risks and How Can They Be Mitigated?

1. Risk 1: Algorithmic Bias. AI systems trained on biased data can produce discriminatory or unfair contractual terms. This can lead to legal and reputational damage.
   Mitigation: Regularly audit your AI models for bias, ensure diverse and clean training data, and maintain transparency in how the AI makes decisions.
2. Risk 2: The “Black Box” Problem. Some complex AI models are “black boxes,” meaning even their creators cannot fully explain why a specific decision was made. This makes it incredibly difficult to justify actions or identify errors in a legal dispute.
   Mitigation: Prioritize the use of “Explainable AI” (XAI) models where possible. Document the AI’s decision-making logic and parameters extensively.
3. Risk 3: Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities. An AI contracting system is a high-value target for cyberattacks. A malicious actor could manipulate the AI to enter into fraudulent contracts, causing significant financial loss.
   Mitigation: Implement state-of-the-art cybersecurity protocols, including data encryption, access controls, and regular security audits, to protect the integrity of the system.

Related Legal Services

• Comprehensive Corporate and Commercial Legal Services
• Legal Assistance for Financial and Contractual Disputes

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Are smart contracts legally valid in India?

Smart contracts, which are self-executing contracts with the terms of the agreement directly written into code, are generally considered legally valid in India under the IT Act, 2000, provided they fulfill the essential requirements of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. According to legal data, their adoption in supply chain and finance is growing by over 25% annually.

Q2: What happens if an AI contract contains a major error, like a wrong price?

If an AI makes a significant error (a ‘material mistake of fact’), the contract may be considered voidable under the Indian Contract Act. The party that deployed the AI would be held responsible for the error. The outcome would depend on the specific facts and whether the other party knew or should have known about the mistake.

Q3: Do I still need a lawyer to review an AI-generated contract?

Absolutely. While AI can be an excellent tool for drafting, it cannot replace the nuanced judgment and strategic advice of a qualified lawyer. A lawyer can identify risks, ensure regulatory compliance, and tailor dispute resolution clauses to protect your interests, especially for high-stake agreements.

Q4: How can I prove an AI contract was formed in a Delhi court?

To prove the formation of an AI contract in a Delhi court, you must present the electronic records of the transaction (e.g., system logs, communication data). Crucially, this evidence must be accompanied by a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, signed by a person responsible for the computer system, to ensure its admissibility.

Q5: Can an AI be sued for breach of contract in India?

No, an AI cannot be sued. It lacks legal personality under Indian law. Any legal action for breach of contract would be brought against the person or company that owns, operates, or deployed the AI system, as they are considered the legal principal in the transaction.

---

Conclusion: Preparing Your Business for the Future of Contracts

The legal landscape in India is clear: AI-generated contracts are not just a future possibility but a current, legally recognized reality. Their validity is anchored in the synergy between the foundational Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the modern provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, this validity is conditional. It demands a proactive approach from businesses to ensure that their automated systems are built on a foundation of legal compliance, evidential integrity, and robust risk management. Attributing legal personality correctly, maintaining meticulous records for evidentiary purposes, and understanding the lines of liability are not optional extras; they are essential for enforceability. As AI continues to evolve, so will the legal nuances surrounding it. Partnering with a law firm that possesses both deep legal acumen and a forward-looking understanding of technology is crucial for businesses aiming to innovate responsibly.